Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics
Statement
Journal of Socio-Economic Review (JSER) uses the
principles of Transparency and Scholarly Publishing to evaluate manuscript. JSER
is Double-Blind Reviewed (peer reviewed/Refereed) journal with broad scope. Following
statement entails the ethical conduct of all parties of publication i.e. Chief
Editor/Editors, Author/s, and Reviewer/s as per the following points.
- All
submitted manuscripts have to undergo a strict and pre-defined
Double-blind-peer-review process by the reviewers who have expertise in
the area and are not a member in Editorial team. - Scientifically
sound, original, bonafide, significant, ethical and consistent with
vision, mission, aim and scope of the journal. - Manuscript
may be accepted, rejected or accepted subject to the revisions (if
allowed). Inconsistent or low quality manuscript may be rejected outright
at the initial stage. - Manuscript
must not have conflict of interests, against public policy, copyright
infringements and plagiarism more than 10 percent.
Responsibility of Author/s
- Authors
are bound to work with publication ethics and academic integrity. Any
unethical approach or behavior is not acceptable. - Manuscript
should contain all necessary information which might help reader to understand
the phenomenon deeply and it should also help them in replication of the
topic. - Authors
are liable for any case of Plagiarism or research misconduct claimed
against them. - If
the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this must be appropriately
cited or quoted. Such quotations and citations must be listed in the
Reference at the end of the Manuscript. - Authors
should provide names of all those who supported in work in
acknowledgement. It should be written in form of a statement at the end of
Manuscript. - Any
financial support should also be given due position in acknowledgement. - Authors
must have to positively participate in the Double-blind-peer-review
process as a policy of JSER. - Authors
may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with an Manuscript
submitted for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public
access to such, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to
retain such data for a reasonable time after publication. - Author/s
cannot get one work published in more than one journal. Submitting the
same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes
unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. - Corresponding
author is the person who is responsible for communication with the journal
and other researchers. He should ensure that names of all the authors are
properly written and Manuscript has been approved by co-author/s. - Authorship
should be limited to only those who have made a significant contribution
in the process of research i.e. from idea generation to execution and
results extraction. - Author/s
should disclose any conflict of interest or opinion between authors. - If
author found a mistake or any other thing that might affect the quality of
publication, it is his/her responsibility to notify the editor/s.
Responsibility of Editor/s
- Editors
must evaluate the manuscripts purely on the basis of Merit and without any
discrimination and favour. - Editors
must keep each and every information confidential regarding submitted
manuscripts. - Editors
have the authority to select/reject any manuscript if it is against
publication ethics, weak in quality and does not follow the vision,
mission, aim and scope of the journal or a case of research misconduct. - Editors
have the responsibility to reject any manuscript if it is plagiarized more
than the limit. - Editors
are morally bound not to use any material from unpublished manuscripts. - Editors
will report to the Chief Editor of the journal. Chief Editor is
responsible to follow the policies laid down in this reference.
Responsibility of Reviewer/s
- Reviewers
must evaluate the manuscripts purely on the basis of Merit and without any
discrimination and favour. - Reviewers
must assist to the Editors in review process and assist the authors for
further improvement. - Reviewers
must keep each and every information confidential regarding submitted
manuscripts. - Reviewers
must notify the editors if the manuscript does not related to his
expertise. - Reviewers
may contact any time to Chief Editor in case of any discrepancy,
mal-practice or research misconduct found in Manuscript. - If
reviewer feels that he has conflict of interest with any written script,
he/she should decline to review it. - Reviewers
are morally bound not to use any material from unpublished manuscripts.
*This
statement is in accordance with the rules laid down by Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE).
Query
If there is a query regarding the publication
ethics, please contact at jserccsu@gmail.com